Oxfam vs WWF-UK
Oxfam grades higher: B+ against B.
Registered charity #202918
A B+ charity with an A+ brand. Serious humanitarian operator, uneven on development, weak on translating its campaigning into policy wins, and with a safeguarding history that was handled badly before it was handled well.
Read the full receiptRegistered charity #1081247
A capable, well-known conservation charity carrying a serious human-rights reckoning and a deficit year, with impact that resists clean measurement.
Read the full receiptThe numbers
Side by side, from the accounts
Oxfam
WWF-UK
Mar 2025
Year ended
Jun 2025
£339m
Income
£89m
£363m
Spending
£96m
4,084
Staff
463
28,920
Volunteers
3,496
10
Trustees
11
0 red, 1 amber
Flags raised
None
Each column shows the latest year that charity has filed, so the periods can differ. Spend ratios appear only where both charities disclose them at that level of detail. See methodology.