England & Wales · Registered 1963
British Heart Foundation
Cardiovascular research and prevention.
Grade
A-
Strong research mandate and scale, lightly marked down because a retail-heavy model carries cost and a single filed year ran at a deficit.
Do Gooder verdict
The UK’s largest independent funder of cardiovascular research, backed by a huge retail engine and clean, on-time reporting.
Reviewed 5 Jun 2026 · Rees Calder
Income
£411m
410,600,000
Spending
£427m
427,100,000
Trustees
11
4,545 staff
Year ended Mar 2025 · 14 months ago
The scorecard
How we’d grade each part of the job
No charity is one thing. Humanitarian response, long-term development, campaigning, safeguarding. We’ve graded each separately, because an A on one doesn’t cover for a C on another.
Research funding
StrongAround £100m of cardiovascular research a year.
BHF describes itself as the biggest independent funder of heart and circulatory research in the UK, funding around £100 million of research projects every year.<sup><a href="#source-2">2</a></sup> In the latest filed accounts (year ending 31 March 2025) grants to institutions ran at £98.6m, which lines up with that claim.<sup><a href="#source-1">1</a></sup> For a donor who wants medical research rather than service delivery, that focus is the point.
Retail engine
MixedMore than half of income comes from trading, not donations.
Of £410.6m total income, £237.5m came from other trading activities (the charity-shop estate) versus £162.3m from donations and legacies.<sup><a href="#source-1">1</a></sup> A large shop network is a durable, recession-resistant income source, but it is also lower-margin and operationally heavy: it means a chunk of every pound raised is consumed running stores before it reaches a lab. Not a flaw, just a model to understand.
Governance & reporting
StrongReporting up to date and on time.
The Charity Commission record shows reporting up to date and on time, with 11 trustees overseeing a charity that employs 4,545 staff and draws on around 20,000 volunteers.<sup><a href="#source-1">1</a></sup> No filing red flags.
Accounts
Where the money sits
Latest year
Year ended Mar 2025
Income
£411m
Spending
£427m
Multi-year history unlocks once CharityBase access is wired. For now we show the latest filed year only.
Research
Our own reading of the charity. Written once, reviewed twice a year, every factual claim footnoted.
Last reviewed 5 Jun 2026
What it is
The British Heart Foundation (charity number 225971) is a UK research charity registered in 1963. Its stated vision is “a world where everyone has a healthier heart for longer,” and it positions itself as the biggest independent funder of research into cardiovascular disease in the UK.3 Heart and circulatory disease remains the world’s leading cause of death, which is the case the charity makes for its existence.
This is a research funder first and a service provider second. If you give to BHF, you are mostly buying science, plus the public-health information and support that surround it.
Where the money actually goes
The latest filed accounts cover the year ending 31 March 2025. Total income was £410.6m and total expenditure was £427.1m, so the charity spent £16.5m more than it raised in that year.1 A single-year deficit at a charity this size is not alarming on its own (it often reflects deliberate use of reserves or timing of research commitments), but it is worth noting rather than glossing over.
The income mix is the headline. Of that £410.6m, £237.5m came from other trading activities, mostly the charity-shop estate, while £162.3m came from donations and legacies and £10.0m from investments.1 Legacies alone were £108.4m. In plain terms: more than half of BHF’s money is earned through retail rather than donated.
On the spending side, grants to institutions were £98.6m and other charitable activity spending brought the charitable total higher.1 That grant figure tracks with BHF’s own claim that it funds around £100 million of research a year.2 Raising funds cost £47.2m and governance just £0.5m.
Effectiveness
For a UK donor whose goal is cardiovascular research, BHF is the obvious institutional vehicle. Its scale, six decades of grant-making, and concentration on a single high-burden disease area mean a donation plausibly reaches well-run research it would be hard for an individual to fund directly.2
The honest caveat is the retail model. A shop estate that turns donated goods into £237.5m of income is a real asset, but it is lower-margin than cash giving and carries staff, property, and logistics costs. The 4,545 employees and 20,000 volunteers reflect an organisation that runs a lot of operations, not just a grant desk.1 None of this is a problem; it is simply the difference between a research charity that also runs a retail business and a lean cash-transfer programme.
The bottom line
A well-governed, on-time-reporting charity doing exactly what it says: funding the lion’s share of independent heart research in the UK. The deficit year and the retail-heavy income mix are reasons to look closely, not reasons to walk away. If you want UK medical research, give with confidence. If your test is global lives saved per pound, weigh it against the global-health options below.
Sources
- 01Financial history BRITISH HEART FOUNDATIONaccessed 5 Jun 2026
- 02Our research | Heart and Circulatory Disease - BHFaccessed 5 Jun 2026
- 03
Maybe not this one
If that’s not what you’re after
If your goal is the most cardiovascular research per pound, BHF is hard to beat in the UK. If your goal is the most lives saved per pound anywhere, global health charities clear a higher bar.
Cancer Research UK
Same disease-research model at larger scale, if you want medical research rather than heart-specific work.
#1089464
Against Malaria Foundation
If the question is lives saved per pound, distributing bednets is among the most evidence-backed buys in global health.
#1105319
Malaria Consortium
Seasonal malaria chemoprevention, repeatedly rated a top global-health buy by independent evaluators.
#1099776
Website
www.bhf.org.ukData: findthatcharity · Refreshed 0 days ago
Flag an error on this page